High Court Rules Calling Men ‘Bald’ as Sexual Harassment

In a landmark decision, the High Court has determined that referring to a man as “bald” can constitute sexual harassment. This ruling stems from a legal case initiated by Tony Finn, an electrician, who alleged that he was sexually harassed by his supervisor during a heated exchange in 2019.

The court’s judgment highlights that the term “bald” is inherently linked to gender, thereby potentially breaching equality laws. This decision has sparked a wide range of reactions, with some individuals dismissing the ruling as excessive. One caller on a radio show argued that the term “bald” lacks sexual connotations and that baldness is not exclusive to men.

Tony Finn, aged 64, filed his claim against the British Bung Company, where he had been employed for 24 years before his dismissal in 2021. He recounted an incident where his supervisor, Jamie King, called him a “stupid bald c***” and threatened him, leaving Finn feeling endangered.

The tribunal, which comprised three bald judges, concluded that the remark “crossed a line” and rejected the defense that the comment was not sexist since women can also be bald. The panel emphasized the connection between the term “bald” and gender, noting that baldness is significantly more common among men.

This ruling has reignited discussions about workplace harassment and the nuances of language used in professional settings. As debates continue, this case serves as a reminder of the evolving understanding of what constitutes harassment.

Next story